« Media Concentration | Main | Timely Disaster Advice -- Plus VOD Ads »
June 18, 2005
Verizon vs. New Jersey
 |
Verizon and SBC have suffered some legal setbacks recently in their quest to implement IPTV as an alternative to cable television.
In an article entitled "Verizon Will Try New Strategy To Advance Its Television Plans," the Wall Street Journal explains that Verizon is now seeking a state-wide carriage solution in New Jersey. It is offering to pay the state's municipalities higher franchise fees in exchange for statewide approval. Verizon is the largest phone company in New Jersey.
[Some] "New Jersey lawmakers ... [will] introduce Verizon-backed legislation this year. Under the proposal, a company seeking to offer TV service would need approval just from the state Board of Public Utilities. Companies getting statewide approval would pay municipalities higher fees ... 3% of annual television revenues, rather than 2%."
Verizon failed to get similar measures in Texas and Virginia passed. Neither of those attempts had the fee increase in them. Verizon officials say they have incorporated lessons from those defeats.
Now, this is what I don't understand about the Telcos' business strategy: why would you pump billions of dollars in infrastructure upgrades, announce that you were going to be in the television business, and only then wake up to the regulatory game? I have never known a local governmental body that wants to voluntarily reqlinquish either power or authority. Also, the cable companies have every reason in the world to hamstring a new entrant with the same regulations that they have suffered through for decades.
So, why did Verizon think they could just waltz in and offer television service with no hastles again? It seems to me that while they are in the early stages of defining their competitiveevision offering, they had better get smarter business executives in place in their IPTV division and pronto.
 |
I questioned SBC's strategy of testing IPTV in Texas a while ago. Read that critique. |
|
Broadcasting & Cable has an article about what happens when competition outpaces regulation. |
|
Verizon has a good team in place signing up television networks. Read about their NBC deal. |
UPDATE:
“Their big objection to complying with existing franchise deals is the market-wide buildout requirement,” says Paul Gallant, media-policy analyst for Stanford Washington Research Group.
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.reinventtv.com/cgi-bin/mt/mtb.cgi/108
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Verizon vs. New Jersey:
» The US (so far) is a distant third in IPTV from The Digital TV Weblog
I know, I know ... you read this blog (and others) for news about IPTV and inevitably you end up reading about so many things going on in Asia and Europe. But some of us live right here in the... [Read More]
Tracked on July 7, 2005 07:44 AM
» Bad News Bells from The Digital TV Weblog
Telco's are taking their legal battle to congress now. Congress may be too little too late for telephone companies battling with cable. "In the past two weeks, lawmakers have announced plans for three different bills [which] ... would allow... [Read More]
Tracked on July 15, 2005 04:44 PM
Comments
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
